Solution George Thomas Posted November 11, 2016 Solution Posted November 11, 2016 I believe that to be hand lettered because there are too many inconsistencies for it to be type. Look at the /a in Man and then the /a in James as examples. Then there are the very noticeable kerns in the /Yo in Young, the /Po in Portrait and the /oyc in Joyce.
aleksey Posted November 11, 2016 Author Posted November 11, 2016 here is an another example, appears, to me, to be the same font/lettering do you think that this is hand lettering as well?
Riccardo Sartori Posted November 11, 2016 Posted November 11, 2016 16 minutes ago, aleksey said: appears, to me, to be the same font/lettering Looking at both covers it seems to me that at least the |James Joyce| part isn’t just composed with the same letters, but it’s exactly the same. See the inconsistency between the two |J|s. I don’t know enough about vintage printing techniques on hardcovers, but I suspect that the whole name was produced as a single block or plate.
George Thomas Posted November 12, 2016 Posted November 12, 2016 @Riccardo Sartori -- My thoughts are the same. I believe it was hand-lettered, then a stereotype made of that for debossing the book cover. In the second sample, note the tight spacing of /bl in Dubliners. In fact the entire word appears to be very tight. Perhaps the publisher's art department did some hand-spacing of a metal proof although my impression of type in that era (1916) is that "tight" typography was not the norm. If this does turn out to be from a metal font, then it will more likely be from a European foundry.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now