Jump to content

Why You Should Stop Using Times New Roman (Research Explains)

Riccardo Sartori

An interesting, if limited, look “from outside”.

 




User Feedback

Recommended Comments

My take on this is that readers are more used to reading sans serif fonts for text than in the past because of computer screens.

Until hi-res (a.k.a. retina) screens were common, serif faces, with their small details, were more difficult to display reasonably well on 72 or 96 dpi screens, looking more like slab serifs which have never been very popular for text. For this reason, sans serif faces were more often used (especially on the web). As a result, people—especially younger people—became accustomed to reading sans serif text.

In the past, sans serif faces were not used for text in print very much. But I believe it's become more acceptable because of the influence of on-screen use of sans to the extent that some people (I would guess younger people especially) now find sans serif faces easier to read in general.

  • Like 2
  • very interesting! 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I winced at Helvetica "New way" and gave up entirely after "suh-REEF". If you can't be bothered to do even the most basic research on font terminology then I fail to understand why I should take seriously anything you have to say about fonts.

Also, the main reason Times New Roman is so widely used is that it was the default font in Microsoft Word for years. That's it. Readability-schmeadability.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As Mark suggests, familiarity and expectation are aspects of readability; if you are noticing the typeface, this is taking away from attention to content. If a university prof is used to reading essays (for example) in 12/24 Times New Roman, they will likely form a slightly different initial impression of the content if the typeface is much different that what they are used to. Even if you move towards something more like the printed material that such content would be seen in (say 11/20 Janson), you might gain some benefit if the essay is good, but lose if the paper is not so good, as the reader's expectations may be set higher. To avoid interfering with reader's attention to content, a novel's text should look like the reader's expectation of a novel; a fashion magazine's text should look like a fashion magazine. The trouble with the readability research I've seen is that it doesn't account for cultural context and reader experience.

  • very interesting! 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites



Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Add a comment...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. You can also check out our Privacy Policy