Nick Shinn Posted March 11, 2012 Posted March 11, 2012 This topic was imported from the Typophile platform This was recently brought to my attention by a friend named … Ariel.http://carbonmade.tumblr.com/post/3220161684/dont-call-me-ariel-my-name-...
Ryan Maelhorn Posted March 12, 2012 Posted March 12, 2012 I still can't believe Arial is supposed to be analogous to Helvetica. They're almost complete different if you ask me.
McBain_v1 Posted March 12, 2012 Posted March 12, 2012 I only really noticed the differences when someone enlarged the letters and then overlaid them one on top of the other, then it was astonishingly obvious. Where I work has both fonts but people seem to interchange them without any thought and it winds me up.
Ryan Maelhorn Posted March 12, 2012 Posted March 12, 2012 Arial is so much colder and more sterile. That's not always a bad thing, depending on what project you're working on.
quadibloc Posted March 13, 2012 Posted March 13, 2012 As I learned from another thread on this forum, Arial was designed to have the same metrics as Helvetica, but the face itself was derived by Monotype from Monotype Grotesque.
timd Posted March 14, 2012 Posted March 14, 2012 I wonder what will happen to Gill’s Ariel when Bush House changes hands. Tim
timd Posted March 15, 2012 Posted March 15, 2012 Yes, and it isn’t appreciated by all. http://www.bbc.co.uk/ariel/17025537 Tim
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now