Charles_borges_de_oliveira Posted August 31, 2012 Posted August 31, 2012 This topic was imported from the Typophile platform Is it just me or does it seem like there are a lot of type snobs in this world.
HVB Posted August 31, 2012 Posted August 31, 2012 Sure. And it's no different than any other field. "What kind of idiot would use/buy a __________?" Fill in the blank with PC, Mac, Ford, Jaguar, Teflon pan, cast-iron pan, etc. etc. - Herb
Riccardo Sartori Posted August 31, 2012 Posted August 31, 2012 It would be a good title for a new typography-related social network! ;-)
cerulean Posted August 31, 2012 Posted August 31, 2012 The saturation of type snobbery is overblown by the general public. "Fonts" are a universal humor shorthand for "stuff that doesn't matter." Having any opinions at all about type makes you a type snob. It offends people that someone thinks about typefaces. People who readily acknowledge a common understanding of what is good or bad taste in music, and who will pick apart the slightest deviations from their ideals in a person's physical appearance, will deliberately use "hated" fonts "just to piss off hipsters."
hrant Posted August 31, 2012 Posted August 31, 2012 Of course once there are too many it won't be worth it. Meta-snobbism. hhp
JamesM Posted August 31, 2012 Posted August 31, 2012 Being a snob is different from being knowledgeable. A snob is someone who offends others by his/her air of superiority. A snob can be knowledgeable or can be clueless; it's their attitude that makes them a snob.
zeno333 Posted August 31, 2012 Posted August 31, 2012 Knowing that a "font" is a particular style and or type size "within" a "typeface" makes one a bit snobbish I guess....Most use the word font where the word typeface should be used. But of course all here already know that ;) ;) ;)
JamesM Posted August 31, 2012 Posted August 31, 2012 Yeah, I think font/typeface is mostly a lost cause; "font" is used by most folks even when it isn't the correct term. And this has nothing to do with typography, but my pet peeve is folks that use "less" when they should use "fewer" (such as "I have less books than I used to"). I even see well-educated folks making that mistake, so I guess the rules have just changed over time.
oldnick Posted August 31, 2012 Posted August 31, 2012 Fools can be found anywhere; pretensions are pretensions, no matter what pretense they pretend…
Mark Simonson Posted August 31, 2012 Posted August 31, 2012 It's hard to blame people for using the word font to mean typeface. Programs don't have typeface menus, you don't install typefaces, and none of these exist: TypefaceShop, TypefaceTypefaces, MyTypefaces, Typeface Bureau, TypefaceHaus, Typefaceographer, TypefaceLab, DaTypeface, Typefaces.com, RoboTypeface, etc., etc. I think we're stuck with font, and I think that's fine.
hrant Posted August 31, 2012 Posted August 31, 2012 Also, when writing articles about... fonts :-) it's actually useful to leverage this ambiguity in order to avoid repetitive-sounding terms. Sometimes you can't avoid "typeface" and sometimes you can't avoid "font" but often it's pretty OK to mix things up. hhp
Charles_borges_de_oliveira Posted August 31, 2012 Author Posted August 31, 2012 I've heard that typeface represents a font with multiple weights while a font that has one weight is simply a font. Who knows. Fonts and typeface mean the same thing to me.
Joshua Langman Posted August 31, 2012 Posted August 31, 2012 Really? Typefaces.com doesn't exist? Someone snatch it up fast! (… I sort of thought H&FJ might have grabbed it.)
Karl Stange Posted September 1, 2012 Posted September 1, 2012 (… I sort of thought H&FJ might have grabbed it.) They use typography.com and Jeremy Tankard has '.net'. It seems strange that no one has taken it though.
John Hudson Posted September 1, 2012 Posted September 1, 2012 For me, the distinction between typeface and font is always present, because I tend to be talking about one or the other in a fairly precise way. Most people are only ever talking about typefaces -- 'I really like Helvetica: it's a great font' -- so don't need to make the distinction. If you are in the business of designing type and making fonts, the distinction is useful and aids clear communication; that isn't snobbery.
John Hudson Posted September 1, 2012 Posted September 1, 2012 Mark: ...and none of these exist: TypefaceShop, TypefaceTypefaces, MyTypefaces, Typeface Bureau, TypefaceHaus, Typefaceographer, TypefaceLab, DaTypeface, Typefaces.com, RoboTypeface, etc. These are all businesses for selling licenses to fonts or tools for making fonts, so what is your point? Fonts are the product. John Hudson, Tiro Typeworks. :)
Nick Shinn Posted September 1, 2012 Posted September 1, 2012 Nothing new in type snobbery. Type culture, and design culture in general, has long looked down its nose at "trade". For the longest time, book types have held the privileged position. For instance, 19 th century sans serif (and other commercial genres) were omitted from type histories until quite recently. Similarly, the historicist movement of the early 20th century, which completely dominated graphic design, has played second fiddle in most design narratives to modernism, which was rarely seen in mass media.
Mark Simonson Posted September 1, 2012 Posted September 1, 2012 what is your point? Fonts are the product. I get that. But my point is that ordinary people see the word "font" much more than "typeface", and that's even true when they look at the names of the places selling type. "Font" is also much more common than "typeface" on computer user interfaces and in application menus. Microsoft Word doesn't have a "Typeface" menu, it has a "Font" menu. I'm not saying it's not an important distinction, just that "typeface" has become somewhat marginalized compared to "font", whether we like it or not, and that it's probably too late to do anything about it. By the way, I don't think the word "type" is in the same danger.
5star Posted September 1, 2012 Posted September 1, 2012 ^+1! I thought long and hard for a typetastic name and url which I thought would cross over several diiferent communities who where already aware of letter shapes. I chose ... font rageous. So as I'm setting up my website developing awesome visuals, I continue to approach several, and very divergent, communities ranging from adult entertainment, to classical music, to grocery stores, etc.. All of them know what a font is (prolly thanks to using their own PCs or whatever), but not so many knew/know what a typeface is. n.
Té Rowan Posted September 2, 2012 Posted September 2, 2012 You make typefaces and sell fonts. No prob.
eliason Posted September 2, 2012 Posted September 2, 2012 No, you design typefaces, make fonts, and sell licenses.
Té Rowan Posted September 2, 2012 Posted September 2, 2012 Close enough for the average web moron, though.
Ryan Maelhorn Posted September 2, 2012 Posted September 2, 2012 Personally I find most people, even creatives, very unaware about fonts and type. So, no, I don't come across a lot of type snobs. Except the ones that always seem to want Copperplate.
dberlowgone Posted September 2, 2012 Posted September 2, 2012 "Is it just me or does it seem like there are a lot of type snobs in this world." Compared to where?
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now