hrant Posted September 2, 2012 Posted September 2, 2012 This topic was imported from the Typophile platform Somebody please let me know who guy on the right is:http://www.flickr.com/photos/rafapf/7869990022 hhp
Riccardo Sartori Posted September 2, 2012 Posted September 2, 2012 If you contact the author of the photo, maybe ha has a version with resolution high enough to read the badge. Edit: as often is the case, I’m late and unhelpful… ;-)
hrant Posted September 2, 2012 Author Posted September 2, 2012 John, that's what I thought, but the name on the badge seemed too long - was it set in a really wide font? Anyway if you remember seeing Jim in that shirt I guess I'm set - thanks! hhp
Stephen Coles Posted September 2, 2012 Posted September 2, 2012 It is indeed Jim Wasco. The typeface used for the badges was Popular.
oldnick Posted September 2, 2012 Posted September 2, 2012 Hrant, What you are seeing is distortion from a wide-angle lens: it tends to be most noticeable at the peripheries. Jim is probably not as wide as he appears in the photo, either…
quadibloc Posted September 2, 2012 Posted September 2, 2012 Technically speaking, that effect is not called "distortion". It is caused by looking at the picture from too far away - the angle the picture makes to your eye should be the same as the angle the scene made to the camera.
kentlew Posted September 3, 2012 Posted September 3, 2012 The typeface used for the badges was Popular. Close but no cigar, Stewf. Actually, the identity in Milwaukee was set in Receiver — basically a slab companion to Antenna.
oldnick Posted September 3, 2012 Posted September 3, 2012 John, Sorry: if it's not distortion, what is it? Based on the 35mm film format, a "normal" focal length of around 55mm is supposed to mimic what the human eye actually sees—although, typically, portrait lenses have focal lengths of 70-85mm. The referenced photo appears to have a focal length of 30-40mm, I am guessing, which means that objects in the periphery will be "misrepresented" to the eye, and actual photographs make this "misrepresentation" apparent.
quadibloc Posted September 3, 2012 Posted September 3, 2012 I'm not sure if the effect has a name, but in optics, distortion is a technical term for what a fisheye lens would have done instead.
Raf Ferreira Posted September 5, 2012 Posted September 5, 2012 Hi All, I'm the author of the picture. It is a fisheye lens in this case and it is Mr. Wasco. (I think). Lens is the Sigma 15mm f/2.8 in a Canon 5D MK II
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now