hrant Posted October 26, 2012 Posted October 26, 2012 Once in a while YouTube is worth the trouble! Thanks for making me laugh pretty hard. The thing is, when you consider it's coming from Hitler, the bottom-line message might in fact be: chill, man - using all those crappy illegitimate fonts is A-OK. hhp
JamesM Posted October 26, 2012 Posted October 26, 2012 > for a public speaking class Since some class members may not know or care much about typography, I'd suggest not getting too technical. You might want to look for a way to humanize the subject, such as telling an interesting story about a famous type designer, or a story about how advertisers use font choices to affect our view of their products. As Nick mentioned, keeping it visual might be a good approach. If you use PowerPoint, one tip — don't put your speech on the slides; just put visuals on the slides that illustrate what you're talking about.
Karl Stange Posted October 26, 2012 Posted October 26, 2012 such as telling an interesting story about a famous type designer Maybe not Eric Gill though, that might be too interesting.
hrant Posted October 26, 2012 Posted October 26, 2012 Cassandre would make a nice story. He hung himself* because a font house turned down his design. * On the night I was born. :-/ hhp
PublishingMojo Posted October 26, 2012 Posted October 26, 2012 Noel Loomis was a typesetter, not a type designer, but he certainly had an interesting story.
Té Rowan Posted October 27, 2012 Posted October 27, 2012 (looks askance at @Karl) 'Coz @Claire is Daily Mail?
Karl Stange Posted October 27, 2012 Posted October 27, 2012 (looks askance at @Karl) 'Coz @Claire is Daily Mail? Eric Gill's god forbid, a ten minute surmation of his life and letters would no doubt engage any audience but is perhaps not the most level introduction to typography and type design...
Chris Dean Posted October 27, 2012 Posted October 27, 2012 @Claire Bibio: When asking for help on a bulletin board, be sure to cite it properly, lest your professor bust you for plagiarism. According to APA 6.0 the proper way to do this is: Dean, C. (2012, October 27). Re: Thread title (Online forum comment). Retrieved from http://url of the thread In this case, replace my name and date with the time and person who answered your question.
PublishingMojo Posted October 27, 2012 Posted October 27, 2012 Eric Gill's notorious private life often distracts us from his artistic achievements, but he did not consider himself as a type designer first and foremost. In his lifetime he was highly acclaimed as a sculptor, and on his own gravestone he described himself as a stonecutter.
5star Posted October 27, 2012 Posted October 27, 2012 That gravestone seems queer. It was manufactured after the passing of Mrs. Gill and not Mr. Gill(?). n.
oldnick Posted October 28, 2012 Posted October 28, 2012 Neil— It would be difficult to carve your own gravestone after you died. Your confusion on the subject may well explain your idyllic entrancement with Capitalism…
5star Posted October 28, 2012 Posted October 28, 2012 Oldnick, at the earliest that 'gravestone' was manufactured 21 years after the passing of Mr. Gill. I'll be the first one to admit to letting some deadlines slip ...but really oldnick 21 years??? Why wait for the passing of Mrs. Gill to give Mr. Gill his due? Socialist cemetery? n.
oldnick Posted October 28, 2012 Posted October 28, 2012 Socialist cemetery? How about “practical”: the gravestone only had to be carved once, and not necessarily in situ, where additions to epitaphs are normally added. Get a clue, wouldja?
oldnick Posted October 28, 2012 Posted October 28, 2012 James— Did I say anything different? I thought not but, evidently, I was mistaken…
JamesM Posted October 28, 2012 Posted October 28, 2012 When 2 people are listed on a gravestone, typically it initially lists the date for the 1st one to pass away, and a blank space is left for the dates for the other one. Then it is revised years later upon the death and burial of the 2nd person.
JamesM Posted October 28, 2012 Posted October 28, 2012 I was agreeing with your comment that the 2nd date was added later.
5star Posted October 28, 2012 Posted October 28, 2012 When 2 people are listed on a gravestone, typically it initially lists the date for the 1st one to pass away, and a blank space is left for the dates for the other one. Then it is revised years later upon the death and burial of the 2nd person. Thanks for the explanation, I did not know that. n.
hrant Posted October 28, 2012 Posted October 28, 2012 That was totally the most epic thread ever. hhp
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now