quadibloc Posted November 22, 2012 Posted November 22, 2012 @J Weltin:And to Futura, much to the dislike of Paul Renner … Indeed. The instructions inside the lid of the Enigma are in Futura.
John Hudson Posted November 22, 2012 Posted November 22, 2012 some excerpts here of Hitler's edict Technically Martin Bormann's edict, although presumably at Hitler's direction.
dberlowgone Posted November 22, 2012 Posted November 22, 2012 Nick... Depends on who made the decision. 95%? Hmmm.
J Weltin Posted November 23, 2012 Posted November 23, 2012 @ John HudsonNick, what's your source for Tschichold considering Modernism as you describe? In The Form of the Book, as I recall, he explains his turn away from asymmetric typography in terms of how difficult it is to do well and hence how it is ill-suited to design specification of the kind he was working on for Penguin. I read this from Tschichold, too. It might have been part of the famous Bill ./. Tschichold dispute. I am not sure. Need to loaf through a lot of magazines to find this source.
Werfer Posted November 23, 2012 Posted November 23, 2012 I never really understood this edict anyway. After all, Hitler was a racist, and he wanted to promote everything German as being superior. Why, then, would he ban something so obviously viewed upon as German (although not true as such, as there was no Germany before 1871, and blackletter fonts were used in many countries all over Europe during the course of history), and go with something relating to Latin origin (the Romans, and therefore, from his perverted point of view, the wrong race). I mean, Stalin, who was not only a communist, but also a nationalist, would never have replaced Cyrillic with Mongolian now, would he? I heard that somehow Hitler thought that especially the Schwabacher was created by a Jew, which later turned out not to be true - can anyone enlighten me on that point? @hrant - thanks for pointing that out. I just LOVE Blackletter typefaces, as well as old German handwritings, and usually designs containing such fonts are being rejected because of "Nazi associations" :-/
Werfer Posted November 23, 2012 Posted November 23, 2012 By the way, I am thinking of making a Sütterlin handwriting font, simply because I cannot find a really nice one. Anyone have any suggestions - maybe I simply wasn't looking at the right types.
Andreas Stötzner Posted November 23, 2012 Posted November 23, 2012 > -Psychological effect of particular typefaces they are using and the reason they designed those specific typefaces Our ancestors have been driven into madness by diabolical type. That is one of the dark secrets about WW II. And the horror is still amongst us
J Weltin Posted November 23, 2012 Posted November 23, 2012 @Werfer The Nazis didn’t want to use blackletters anymore because the rest of Europe didn’t use them much and switched a while before to Roman letters. After all, the Nazis wanted to be the most modern people in the world, so blackletters did not mirror their superiority. That they originated from the Jews was just a pretense to get rid of the blackletters as soon as possible. The Jews were blamed for everything in Nazi Germany. There is no blackletter tradition in the Jewish script, as far as i know. It was only a cheap excuse – and a ridiculous one.
quadibloc Posted November 23, 2012 Posted November 23, 2012 @Werfer:Why, then, would he ban something so obviously viewed upon as German The usual answer was that using Fraktur made German propaganda unreadable to foreign-language audiences. So they made up a story about Fraktur really being a "Schwabacher-Jewish" design. Of course, that begs a question: why on Earth not just continue using Fraktur for German, and Roman type for printing in other languages? But I think the answer is clear: Germany under the Nazis was such an absolute dictatorship that it was not enough to make a more sensible rule; everything had to be black and white, all-or-nothing, to fit with the desired mentality of obedience without thought.
Michel Boyer Posted November 23, 2012 Posted November 23, 2012 I never really understood this edict anyway. [Werfer] You can find on Wikipedia a statement that Hitler would have made as early as 1934 in the Reichstag; here is the English translation from the article Antiqua Fraktur dispute Your alleged gothic internalisation does not fit well in this age of steel and iron, glass and concrete, of womanly beauty and manly strength, of head raised high and intention defiant... In a hundred years, our language will be the European language. The nations of the east, the north and the west will, to communicate with us, learn our language. The prerequisite for this: The script called Gothic is replaced by the script we have called Latin so far... For the German version, see Erlass zur alleinigen Unterrichtung der lateinischen Schreibschrift als neuer „deutscher Normalschrift“.
k.l. Posted November 23, 2012 Posted November 23, 2012 @ Pablo Impallari This "Organisationshandbuch" is exactly what its title says, an overview of the structure and subdivisions of this party. It shows emblems etc. by which these are identified. This does not make it a design manual though. (Even if e.g. Mr Heller thinks so.) @ John Hudson Hello John, Nick is right about Tschichold's remark about New Typography and totalitarianism. See the chapter "Exile" in Christopher Burke's "Active Literature": "Its [New Typography's] attitude conforms most particularly to the German bent for the absolute, and its military will to order and claim to sole domination reflect those fearful components of the German character that unleashed Hitler's rule and the Second World War. This became clear to me only much later, in democratic Switzerland." (P.293. From Tschichold's "Glaube und Wirklichkeit" which was part of the Tschichold/Bill dispute as Jürgen said.)
J Weltin Posted November 23, 2012 Posted November 23, 2012 Thanks Karsten for confirming that i remembered it right (no searching for magazines …).
Jens Kutilek Posted November 23, 2012 Posted November 23, 2012 Andreas Stötzner: «Our ancestors have been driven into madness by diabolical type. That is one of the dark secrets about WW II.» I sure hope Guido Knopp and Christian Brückner will enlighten us on this matter in their current ZDF history soap opera «Geheimnisse des Zweiten Weltkriegs» :) Maybe Lovecraft was right in that certain shapes are intrinsically evil after all ...
John Hudson Posted November 23, 2012 Posted November 23, 2012 Thanks, Karsten. Tschichold's comment seems to me to be really about the spirit under which the New Typography was undertaken: the radical, ideological absolutism that not only puts forward something new but feels it necessary to denigrate that which came before. I don't think this is a particularly German characteristic or necessarily linked to totalitarianism, but I can understand how the experience of the Nazi years would have made it seem so to Tschichold. It raises the question, of course, whether something like the New Typography could develop, as a set of design principles resulting in a graphic style, without this absolutism?
William Berkson Posted November 23, 2012 Posted November 23, 2012 I think the amusing thing about Tschichold is that he was equally dogmatic in his modernist and anti-modernist phases, at least in theory. In practice, he was a real master in whatever style he worked in. I think others did adopt the modernist style and adapt it. Didn't this evolve into the 'international style' of the '60s? It seems like every style has its fanatics, who use it badly or where it doesn't work, and eventually drive it out of fashion...
quadibloc Posted November 24, 2012 Posted November 24, 2012 @Andreas Stötzner:Our ancestors have been driven into madness by diabolical type. I assume this is levity, even if devotion to Fraktur may be held by some to be a symptom of the madness of exaggerated nationalism. But I know that it is claimed that many of the German people in the past were driven into madness by overly strict child-rearing practices; the book Soul Murder, for example, discussed this. EDIT: The one by Morton Schatzman, not the one by Leonard Sheingold.
k.l. Posted November 26, 2012 Posted November 26, 2012 Tschichold was a black/white kind of person throughout his life, and a pretty self-confident one.* With this in mind, it indeed helps to not take every single word or argument too seriously (designers and arguments aren't necessarily best friends anyway) and read his comments as saying something about a certain spirit, as John said. I think there is something to it, at a more abstract level, in that New Typography and Nazism are 'movements' and as such share some common features. * Bill, appalled by what he considered as a reactionary move of Tschichold, started his attack on Tschichold by referring to him as "one of the known typography theorists". Tschichold, in his reply, was not shy to point out that he is not "one of" but "by my best knowledge the only one". (Today I found a copy of Bosshard's Bill kontra Tschichold. Bosshard's essay and Hochuli's shorter afterword provide some information about the context, including some funny quotes from a letter of Bill to Paul Rand about the matter. Recommended.)
danielsabino Posted December 13, 2012 Posted December 13, 2012 How is the acceptance of them in Germany? These kind of typeface is prohibited? How far the connection with Nazis is a problem? I feel that outside Germany there's no problem using them.
hrant Posted December 13, 2012 Posted December 13, 2012 From what I've observed in the past few years even inside Germany things have been -thankfully- easing up. hhp
Ralf H. Posted December 13, 2012 Posted December 13, 2012 Of course no typefaces are forbidden in Germany! :-) Still, the association of blackletter and Nazi regime remains and that’s what makes them hard to use. Seeing an old rural tavern sign set in blackletter is no problem, as well as a fancy and colorful parfum ad or CD cover. But if you set a regular black headline in a blackletter typeface, it's hard for a German not to make the association with radical right politics. I am currently setting a German typography magazine with blackletter headlines. Still feels strange. Even though I and my readers know that the connection of blackletter and Nazi regime is purely artificial. I gave the headlines a blue gradient to relieve my discomfort. ;-) This way it looks less like 1930s propaganda.
danielsabino Posted December 14, 2012 Posted December 14, 2012 Yeah, I understand. But that's really sad once Blackletters are (to my taste) more beautiful when in black color. I hope this feeling disappear in future German generations. The more we use it in different contexts, the faster it will disappear. Let's free those beautiful letterforms ;)
danielsabino Posted December 14, 2012 Posted December 14, 2012 Note: in my first post I was referring specifically to those "jackboot grotesk", not Blackletters in general.
John Hudson Posted December 14, 2012 Posted December 14, 2012 I gave the headlines a blue gradient to relieve my discomfort. ;-) This way it looks less like 1930s propaganda. The design of the book Fraktur mon amour also cleverly subverted the National Socialist associations of blackletter.
Maxim Zhukov Posted December 14, 2012 Posted December 14, 2012 So did Albert Kapr in his design of Fraktur: Form und Geschichte der gebrochenen Schriften.
danielsabino Posted December 14, 2012 Posted December 14, 2012 Well remembered, but this is also sad once this book is in German language only and they have no plans to translate it to english. Even so I am willing to buy it. An Oscar for anyone to translate it.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now