muzzer Posted August 16, 2007 Posted August 16, 2007 This topic was imported from the Typophile platform SO what do you fullas think about this? I know there ar eheaps of con artists ripoffs but this is so blatant that it is shocking! orignal: http://vllg.com/Thirstype/Infinity/mudTyper+Weights/ ripoff: http://www.myfonts.com/fonts/t26/aeon/ is this typical for t26?? I know they were really hot about 10 years ago, but who is really into this?? Muzz
Stephen Coles Posted August 16, 2007 Posted August 16, 2007 This is not a typical T26 borrowing of concept. I think Thirstype definitely has a legitimate cause for complaint.
Nick Shinn Posted August 16, 2007 Posted August 16, 2007 Well maybe they thought chester was some old guy like adrian frutiger, so it was OK to make like microsoft (segoe) or adobe (myriad).
dicharry Posted August 16, 2007 Posted August 16, 2007 is there any recourse for something like this? i always remember hearing that you "can't copyright an alphabet" which allowed for all kinds of helvetica and frutiger knockoffs. so the question is: what can 3st do other than shame T26 into voluntarily removing the font from their collection?
Stephen Coles Posted August 16, 2007 Posted August 16, 2007 Perhaps T26 is unaware of Infinity, and just accepted it on its merits. Hard to imagine, but possible. Either way, they should be more careful. What Mr. Paul Nojima was thinking, I can't imagine.
Robert Trogman Posted August 16, 2007 Posted August 16, 2007 This happens all the time. The only thing you can protect is the name.
Stephen Coles Posted August 16, 2007 Posted August 16, 2007 Robert - I understand your experience is from the film type era when copying was common, but this level of plagiarism of an existing digital typeface is actually pretty rare today.
raph Posted August 16, 2007 Posted August 16, 2007 Of course, what's truly unforgivable is that the T26 ripoff is of inferior quality. When H&FJ rework the already excellent Avenir into the transcendently good Gotham, that's called "standing on the shoulders of giants." But this is just trying to make a dishonest buck off the backs of others. In other countries than the US, there may be legal recourse. In the meantime, Mr. Nojima and T26 have created an entry onto their permanent Internet records that will be very hard to erase. I certainly can't imagine legitimate font people or designers working with either one now. For shame.
Miss Tiffany Posted August 16, 2007 Posted August 16, 2007 I've emailed them to see if we can't get a response. Until then I think it is best to not jump the gun. T26 is a nice group of people who do not condone piracy so I will give them the benefit of the doubt as I hope we would all do.
Uli Posted August 17, 2007 Posted August 17, 2007 > you “can’t copyright an alphabet” But in some countries, you may register new and original letter designs. > bloody con artist ripoff In my terminology, it is not a "ripoff", but rather a forgery by the Monotype method, because, while most lowercase and uppercase letters and most tabular figures are identical in design, there are a few exceptions, e.g. capital "K", German "ß", the "@" sign and a few other characters: http://www.sanskritweb.net/temporary/infinity-aeon.jpg Yet, another question is, whether "Infinity" is an original font at all. More research would be required to decide this question.
Stephen Coles Posted August 17, 2007 Posted August 17, 2007 I've done the research. Infinity is original. Aeon is not.
ybaggar Posted August 17, 2007 Posted August 17, 2007 Paul Nojima about Aeon: "I created this typeface to be used for my own personnal identity system. I wanted something UNIQUE to represent myself." Wow!
SuperUltraFabulous Posted August 17, 2007 Posted August 17, 2007 It's too close to be unintentional. Not one person has the same exact idea for 97% of the alphabet. Although it is not discussed very often, designers do compete with each other. New genres enter the market (or re-enter) and then in two to three years time you have many types that are competitive with each other. And it makes sense too. If there is a [historic] model- there's always room a new spin- even if it's not old. Its also good for consumers too. If I like Bureau Grotesque but not the price (700 smackers) or its serious demeanor then Process Type's Maple- but it doesn't have old style figures and maybe too much personality then Parry from OurType which is super clean maybe a little too sanitized then I have to wait for National Grotesque from KLIM which has a little Akzidenz in it but if want more Swiss then Endurance Pro from Ascender Corp which is super affordable and reminds me of... I think you get the idea! Inspired- but not a copy nor a forgery. So since this is an obvious copy I wonder if he just customized Infinity to his liking and mistakingly reasoned he could sell his modified copy. And just for arguments sake- What inspired Infinity? Is Infinity based on a type that has a structure/skeleton just so that we could say two people looking at the same source could get 'inspired' to created a techie sans with a similar look much in same way my examples above seem to? I hope all is worked out soon, Mike Diaz
Nicole Dotin Posted August 17, 2007 Posted August 17, 2007 Muzz, curious as to what your connection is to the typeface and why you're interested in stirring this pot so publicly...
SuperUltraFabulous Posted August 17, 2007 Posted August 17, 2007 Off Topic>>> Nicole I love your Elena!!! I hope to see it published soon!!! Congrats... Mike Diaz :o)
kegler Posted August 17, 2007 Posted August 17, 2007 is there any recourse for something like this? Yes. The affected parties could work it out amicably or it could get messy. Too close for coincidence and T.26 likely was unaware or would not have released it. Perhaps the type world could use an arbitrator for such issues.
Miss Tiffany Posted August 17, 2007 Posted August 17, 2007 I was only playing list-mom again. Sorry to those who think I was out of line. When I come across things that are too close for comfort I email the foundries.
crossgrove Posted August 17, 2007 Posted August 17, 2007 Raph, a note: Frutiger referred to Futura when designing Avenir (hence the name). Gotham is derived directly from building signage in New York City, hence its name. It shares some traits with Avenir, but I doubt H+F-J even referred to Avenir in the development of Gotham. The major difference is the x-height.
KenBessie Posted August 17, 2007 Posted August 17, 2007 Tiff why are you apologizing? You stated that you asked both foundries for their comments and asked us not to speculate until we hear their positions. Truly commendable. But also, thanks to muzzer for drawing our attention to this. Now we, as a group, are aware of the situation. But we need details from Village and T26.
Village Posted August 17, 2007 Posted August 17, 2007 Hello all. It has been interesting to read the lively discussion here. Murray is a long-standing and repeat customer of Village, and previously Thirstype. He has licensed several of our faces, and has provided valuable feedback and insights. Yes, he has a gruff manner and an... "unedited" prose style, but he's a good guy. He emailed me yesterday to point out the similarities of Aeon to Infinity, and asked if I thought it was appropriate for him to post on this site. I didn't see why not, and told him I had no objections. I immediately leapt into action myself, contacting both MyFonts and T-26, and receiving quick replies from each concerning the matter. In fact, the Aeon typeface has already been removed from the T-26 site, and should hopefully be wiped from the MyFonts database shortly. To address Uli's question about the originality of Infinity. The face was originally designed at Thirst as part of a new identity for the modem manufacturer USRobotics in late 2000. The process is documented in the book "Emotion As Promotion": http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/1580930972/qid=1108143698/... With best regards to the Typophiliacs, chester Village
Miss Tiffany Posted August 17, 2007 Posted August 17, 2007 Thank you for filling in the blanks, Chester.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now