dberlowgone Posted June 15, 2009 Posted June 15, 2009 bowerbird: dissent is great, parameterized dissent is best. Cheers!
eliason Posted June 15, 2009 Posted June 15, 2009 I think with the increased use of randomized-character passwords ambiguity has become more of a problem. (On the software registration window do I enter "plK0jl7IQ33" or "plKOj17lQ33")
dtw Posted June 15, 2009 Posted June 15, 2009 Quite. I must say that whenever I have to email corrections to our typesetters, the moment any of the changes involves l/I/1, I select the entire email and change it to Georgia. (If anyone knows how to make Outlook 2003 do rich-text emails in Georgia by default instead of Arial I'd be grateful to learn it!) ________________________________________________ Ever since I chose to block pop-ups, my toaster's stopped working.
Si_Daniels Posted June 15, 2009 Author Posted June 15, 2009 >If anyone knows how to make Outlook 2003 do rich-text emails in Georgia by default instead of Arial I’d be grateful to learn it! Maybe.. tools / options / mail format / fonts
dtw Posted June 15, 2009 Posted June 15, 2009 Duh. Thanks for that si; should've worked that out for myself. Sorry for drifting off-topic there folks
bowerbird Posted June 15, 2009 Posted June 15, 2009 > bowerbird: dissent is great, parameterized dissent is best. well david, i thought the parameter was clear here: when two letters look highly similar, it's confusing. -bowerbird
Dan B. Posted June 15, 2009 Posted June 15, 2009 Probably not relevant to regular usage, but I'll submit an example in Romanian when I and l (similarly designed) create problems in reading religious texts. It's customary, globally I believe, to capitalize all pronouns that refer to God in such documents. This can confuse the reader in that he/she cannot easily distinguish between I (a pronoun referring to God in this case) and l (a pronoun referring to a human). My sample uses Myriad. EDIT: Then again, I have to admit I dislike Verdana's I...
dberlowgone Posted June 16, 2009 Posted June 16, 2009 >when two letters look highly similar, it’s confusing. Yes, I am aware of that effect. Yet... 90% of all sans share a lack of the features of which we speak, and... they've lasted in the market for sometimes a century. Is something else happening too? Cheers!
John Hudson Posted June 16, 2009 Posted June 16, 2009 ...they’ve lasted in the market for sometimes a century. Is something else happening too A few new things are happening. One is contracted text messaging, in which letters and also numerals are being used in novel ways, such that individual letter differentiation becomes more critical than in word recognition supported by familiarity and context. Another is the proliferation on non-linguistic informational text such as URLs, file names, etc. -- including critical information such as indicators on flight control monitors -- , requiring quick identification of individual letters rather than normal reading. I don't think there is an a priori problem with styles of lettering that make less differentiation between forms than other styles of lettering. Just choose the style that is appropriate to the functional requirements of the typography.
bowerbird Posted June 16, 2009 Posted June 16, 2009 david said: > Is something else happening too? yes. the people who design and run things are out-of-touch, and fail to listen when the dissent bubbles up from the trenches, so we groundlings must muddle through the mess they've made, and make to this very day because "we've always done it that way". for instance, here's what ed colligan, the head of palm, said in 2006, when he was asked to comment on the upcoming debut of the iphone: > “We’ve learned and struggled for a few years here figuring out > how to make a decent phone. PC guys are not going to just > figure this out. They’re not going to just walk in.” that seems unbelieveably pigheaded and naive in retrospect, not? oh well, at least unlike the financial shitheads, you font-makers are not extracting massive tons of money out of the economy, or -- once your house of cards has fallen apart -- insisting that you need to continue receiving your obscenely-huge year-end bonuses. so, as "experts" go, you're relatively benign... ;+) -bowerbird p.s. of course, when global-warming chickens come home to roost, that's gonna make the recent financial collapse look like peanuts...
joeclark Posted June 16, 2009 Posted June 16, 2009 Smartphone usage is generally one of rushed reading (boss’s top-posted E-mail), rarely longer reading (E-book), very often precise text duplication (passwords, a living hell on my iTouch). Hence an intelligent system might use straight or tailled els in different circumstances, or at different point sizes. Eventually somebody is going to mention that, like Segoe by Microsoft, Prelude is merely a clone of Avenir. I mean “mention” as in “level an accusation.” — Joe Clarkhttp://joeclark.org/
dberlowgone Posted June 17, 2009 Posted June 17, 2009 I was prepared to turn this job down when the VP of engineering sent me an email. He responded that this was not going to be like Windows or the Mac. I was skeptical, so I ticked off a list of capabilities that I felt were required in any model modern device, desktops included, to make me (users) happy. (I ticked off exactly the same list here sometime ago to dead silence). This client though, he said "We can do that... all of it!" The Pre is typographically for real: it uses TT, it scales according to code, it's got a sweet rendering, OT is supported and feature acceptance expanding, 180 dpi!, integer metrics, font fidelity and open. I hear what's being asked of the some-serif, and will endeavor to please, thank you. Read on! Hug a Tree! Cheers!
Bert Vanderveen Posted June 17, 2009 Posted June 17, 2009 @Joe: Today’s iPhone OS 3.0 software release solves at least one of your beefs: copy/(cut)/paste has been implemented at last. . . . Bert Vanderveen BNO
Si_Daniels Posted June 17, 2009 Author Posted June 17, 2009 >He responded that this was not going to be like Windows or the Mac. That's exactly what struck me when I first saw the interface (before knowing David and Tom were involved) when looking at videos and static shots like these was that with good interface design, and a high-res display, the need for font tricks like cap I, and ClearType is diminished. Not sure the Pre is there yet, but seems to be headed in the right direction. PS. What surprised me was lack of sub-pixel positioning in the browser. But that could be a webkit / perf trade-off.
k.l. Posted June 17, 2009 Posted June 17, 2009 OT is supported and feature acceptance expanding Could you say more about this? (Or perhaps a link to further information?)
Nick Shinn Posted June 17, 2009 Posted June 17, 2009 Eventually somebody is going to mention that, like Segoe by Microsoft, Prelude is merely a clone of Avenir. And then someone else will mention that Avenir is merely a clone of Nobel.
Nick Shinn Posted June 17, 2009 Posted June 17, 2009 David, thanks for trailblazing the market (again). How long before Pre users can install any font they want?
joeclark Posted June 17, 2009 Posted June 17, 2009 But Nobel wasn’t what they were cloning. When your daughter dresses up like Jessica Simpson, she isn’t cloning Eve. — Joe Clarkhttp://joeclark.org/
Si_Daniels Posted June 17, 2009 Author Posted June 17, 2009 That Starling looks awful familiar, but I can't quite place it. Give me enough times and I'm sure it will come to me. ;-)
William Berkson Posted June 17, 2009 Posted June 17, 2009 Actually the Starling 'ultra', now the featured face, has old style stress, like the regular, whereas Times Bold has 'modern' vertical stress. Of course Mike Parker says its the original, and Times the copy. I wonder what all the differences are...
Nick Shinn Posted June 17, 2009 Posted June 17, 2009 ...like Segoe by Microsoft, Prelude is merely a clone of Avenir. Let's see if Adrian Frutiger returns his SOTA award.
William Berkson Posted June 18, 2009 Posted June 18, 2009 Segoe was found to be too much like Frutiger--not like Avenir--by the EU. Do Avenir and Frutiger look alike to you, Joe? :)
Si_Daniels Posted June 18, 2009 Author Posted June 18, 2009 >Do Avenir and Frutiger look alike to you, Joe? :) I've seen the secret Linotype roadmap - next year they ship Frutenir - then year after next it's Frutenir Next.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now