Jump to content

Search the Community

Showing results for tags 'youtube sans'.

  • Search By Tags

    Type tags separated by commas.
  • Search By Author

Content Type


Forums

  • Public Typography Forums
    • Talk
    • Font Identification
    • Font Downloads
  • Exclusive to Members
    • Type Design Forum
    • Letterpress Forum
    • Calligraphy/Lettering Forum
    • Show
    • Internal
    • Coffee Shop
  • Exclusive to Patrons
    • Patron Forum

Categories

  • Artisanal workshops & studios
  • Museums & Libraries
  • Apps
  • Education
  • Organizations
  • Online Typography Resources
  • Educational Video Channels
  • Typography Books
  • Magazines
  • Publishers

Categories

  • Link suggestions
  • Newsletter Archive (1-99)
    • Typography Weekly #1
    • Typography Weekly #2
    • Typography Weekly #3
    • Typography Weekly #4
    • Typography Weekly #5
    • Typography Weekly #6
    • Typography Weekly #7
    • Typography Weekly #8
    • Typography Weekly #9
    • Typography Weekly #10
    • Typography Weekly #11
    • Typography Weekly #12
    • Typography Weekly #13
    • Typography Weekly #14
    • Typography Weekly #15
    • Typography Weekly #16
    • Typography Weekly #17
    • Typography Weekly #18
    • Typography Weekly #19
    • Typography Weekly #20
    • Typography Weekly #21
    • Typography Weekly #22
    • Typography Weekly #23
    • Typography Weekly #24
    • Typography Weekly #25
    • Typography Weekly #26
    • Typography Weekly #27
    • Typography Weekly #28
    • Typography Weekly #29
    • Typography Weekly #30
    • Typography Weekly #31
    • Typography Weekly #32
    • Typography Weekly #33
    • Typography Weekly #34
    • Typography Weekly #35
    • Typography Weekly #36
    • Typography Weekly #37
    • Typography Weekly #38
    • Typography Weekly #39
    • Typography Weekly #40
    • Typography Weekly #41
    • Typography Weekly #42
    • Typography Weekly #43
    • Typography Weekly #44
    • Typography Weekly #45
    • Typography Weekly #46
    • Typography Weekly #47
    • Typography Weekly #48
    • Typography Weekly #49
    • Typography Weekly #50
    • Typography Weekly #51
    • Typography Weekly #52
    • Typography Weekly #53
    • Typography Weekly #54
    • Typography Weekly #55
    • Typography Weekly #56
    • Typography Weekly #57
    • Typography Weekly #58
    • Typography Weekly #59
    • Typography Weekly #60
    • Typography Weekly #61
    • Typography Weekly #62
    • Typography Weekly #63
    • Typography Weekly #64
    • Typography Weekly #65
    • Typography Weekly #66
    • Typography Weekly #67
    • Typography Weekly #68
    • Typography Weekly #69
    • Typography Weekly #70
    • Typography Weekly #71
    • Typography Weekly #72
    • Typography Weekly #73
    • Typography Weekly #74
    • Typography Weekly #75
    • Typography Weekly #76
    • Typography Weekly #77
    • Typography Weekly #78
    • Typography Weekly #79
    • Typography Weekly #80
    • Typography Weekly #81
    • Typography Weekly #82
    • Typography Weekly #83
    • Typography Weekly #84
    • Typography Weekly #85
    • Typography Weekly #86
    • Typography Weekly #87
    • Typography Weekly #88
    • Typography Weekly #89
    • Typography Weekly #90
    • Typography Weekly #91
    • Typography Weekly #92
    • Typography Weekly #93
    • Typography Weekly #94
    • Typography Weekly #95
    • Typography Weekly #96
    • Typography Weekly #97
    • Typography Weekly #98
    • Typography Weekly #99
  • Newsletter Archive (100-199)
    • Typography Weekly #100
    • Typography Weekly #101
    • Typography Weekly #102
    • Typography Weekly #103
    • Typography Weekly #104
    • Typography Weekly #105
    • Typography Weekly #106
    • Typography Weekly #107
    • Typography Weekly #108
    • Typography Weekly #109
    • Typography Weekly #110
    • Typography Weekly #111
    • Typography Weekly #112
    • Typography Weekly #113
    • Typography Weekly #114
    • Typography Weekly #115
    • Typography Weekly #116
    • Typography Weekly #117
    • Typography Weekly #118
    • Typography Weekly #119
    • Typography Weekly #120
    • Typography Weekly #121

Categories

  • Free Font Lists
  • Font alternatives
  • Fonts by topic/style
  • Fonts by region
  • Signage Fonts
  • Fonts by User

Categories

  • How to choose and pair fonts
  • Understanding Kerning & Tracking
  • How to use OpenType in InDesign
  • Font Licensing 101
  • Variable fonts for graphic and web designers
  • Typography on Apple devices

Categories

  • Running Competition
  • Hall of Fame
    • 2022
    • 2021
    • 2020
    • 2019

Product Groups

  • Patron Subscription
  • One-time Support

Find results in...

Find results that contain...


Date Created

  • Start

    End


Last Updated

  • Start

    End


Filter by number of...

Found 1 result

  1. Ralf Herrmann

    The honest YouTube Sans reviews

    YouTube Sans was created by Saffron in partnership with Letterjuice in Barcelona and URW++ in Hamburg. Unfortunately, Saffron’s presentation page for the project rather feels like a sales pitch—or a parody of such presentations. We see typical clichés like adding construction circles to the finished artwork. Almost funny are the following images, that honestly want to draw a connection between the rounded YouTube play button and the execution of the YouTube Sans letters, such as the G. You know that this would be true for the vast majority of typefaces, right? And the tension of the specific arcs isn’t even similar. But all this marketing talk aside, what about the type design itself? Currently YouTube Sans comes in several upright weights. The overall look of the design isn’t anything spectacular. A modern sans-serif design leaning towards geometric designs, which are very popular currently. So its not really a bold choice, but the execution does have a subtle uniqueness, which could certainly be sufficient to serve the branding requirements of a custom font. But type designers have critizized the execution of the design. Both looking at the details, like how arcs and stems meet, as well as how letters work together, the design doesn’t feel as consistent and professional as it could be. Its easy to point to successful retail typefaces in the same general sans-serif category with much better execution and visual consistency. But the biggest flaw of the design is certainly the use of another branding cliché: randomly cutting off corners of letters. A trend so big, that has its own Tumblr feed as a “hall of shame”. Yes, its lazy and there is never an acceptable justification for it. Just because its so easy to do in your vector design app, doesn’t make it desirable. Stroke endings can take on many different shapes, but in the end (or on the end in this case), consistency is key. It goes back to the roots of typefaces in writing, where the stroke endings were a result of the writing tool and the angle one would hold this tool. Rounding or cutting off corners arbitrarily can only lead to an inconsistent and distracting appearance. Explaining it through the angles of the YouTube play button triangle might be a nice gimmick in a pitch, but it doesn’t do anything useful in the real-world use of the type family. YouTube Sans on the YouTube TV welcome page You can see YouTube Sans in use here. The bold headlines do their job quite nicely. This is where your custom (display) font can shine. The legibility of the smaller text isn’t as good though. Google’s Roboto, recently rolled out on youtube.com works much better in such cases. It will be interesting to see how these different typefaces will be used and possibly combined in the future. What’s your opinion on YouTube Sans? Feel free to share your thoughts in the comment section below. Links: analysis by Nina Stössinger on Typographica
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. You can also check out our Privacy Policy