Member Rya… Posted May 5, 2012 Share Posted May 5, 2012 This topic was imported from the Typophile platform I have a font I am offering and have a single mirror imaged(horizontally) Uppercase Q in the set. I quite like it personally, but realize this will ruin its potential use for organizations whose name begins with Q. I would like to offer an easy to use alternate proper Q, but can not use opentype. I was thinking of creating a font family, having the regular version be with the proper Q, and have the "italic" version with the backwards Q. There will be no REAL italics in the family, and I thought this would be a nice and neat way of solving the problem. advice? Link to comment
Member old… Posted May 5, 2012 Share Posted May 5, 2012 Alternately, you could simply place the Q.alt in a seldom-used slot, like the currency symbol or logical not... Link to comment
Member hra… Posted May 5, 2012 Share Posted May 5, 2012 I think Ryan's hack is a lesser evil, because at least if you change the font the alt /Q doesn't become gibberish. But I'd rather see Bold be recruited instead Italic. hhp Link to comment
Member eli… Posted May 5, 2012 Share Posted May 5, 2012 So you'd expect the user to install a second font called italic (or bold) that was the same in every regard except the direction of the /Q/? That seems like it would be more confusing than oldnick's solution to me. Link to comment
Member The… Posted May 5, 2012 Share Posted May 5, 2012 Why? Making it a separate font (1) makes it easy for the user to change any or all Q's appearance, and (2) preserves the original "data behind the font" (it's still a regular "Q", as far as changing the font, searching, and copying is concerned). But I'm curious about Ryan's I would like to offer an easy to use alternate proper Q, but can not use opentype. statement. Are you not allowed by someone? Doesn't your software support this? Don't you know how? Link to comment
Member Jam… Posted May 5, 2012 Share Posted May 5, 2012 Why not just make a "display" version instead of using a workaround like using the italics? Link to comment
Member agi… Posted May 6, 2012 Share Posted May 6, 2012 I agree with JamesT -- a separate font (display or alternate or whatever) is probably preferable. Apart from a general aversion to misleading style naming, you face two potential problems with using italid or bold: (1) If the user 'italicizes' or 'bolds' a passage which contains no Q, and thus sees no change, they may come to think the font is defective or that it is not installed. (2) If you ever do decide to design an italic or bold weight, you face all sorts of backwards compatibility issues. André Link to comment
Member Cri… Posted May 6, 2012 Share Posted May 6, 2012 I’d go for naming the font something like “[Name of your typeface] Alt Q”. Link to comment
Member ahy… Posted May 8, 2012 Share Posted May 8, 2012 I think an alternate font is the best way. By the way, what about (ab)using the Cyrillic Q codepoint (Ԛ, Unicode 051A)? Link to comment
Member Rya… Posted May 8, 2012 Author Share Posted May 8, 2012 How would that work for the user, ahyangyi? Would they have to open the windows character map and copy and paste it, or type in some obscure character code? What would really be awesome is if when the user presses SHIFT + Q, they would get the regular Q; but if they press ALT + Q they would get the alternate. Not sure if this is possible however. Link to comment
Member Ric… Posted May 8, 2012 Share Posted May 8, 2012 SHIFT + Q, they would get the regular Q; but if they press ALT + Q they would get the alternate. You will need to provide a custom keyboard layout (and instructions on how to use it) along the font for make it happen. Link to comment
Member Rya… Posted May 9, 2012 Author Share Posted May 9, 2012 Unfortunately, ALT is used a lot for shortcuts in software. I would think the system could overwrite an ALT + Q key press combination to do whatever the currently running piece of software wants it to do, even when the user is entering text. Am I wrong? I wish there was a way. Link to comment
Member Ric… Posted May 9, 2012 Share Posted May 9, 2012 I wish there was a way. As I already said: custom keyboard layout: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Keyboard_layout#Customized_functional_layouts Link to comment
Member Joh… Posted May 9, 2012 Share Posted May 9, 2012 If you want the character to be searchable/sortable as 'Q', then it needs to be encoded as 'Q' and not as some other character. Hijacking standard codepoints of other characters for such a purpose would be particularly frowned upon; using a Private Use Area codepoint would be cleaner, but still would mean that the glyph is encoded as something other than 'Q'. OpenType is the obvious way to handle this, because OpenType Layout is specifically designed to resolve this issue: to allow more than one glyph to represent a single character. Link to comment
Member The… Posted May 9, 2012 Share Posted May 9, 2012 John, Ryan is somehow unable to use OpenType: ..but [I] can not use opentype.. I guess it'll remain a mystery forever why he cannot. Link to comment
Member Joh… Posted May 9, 2012 Share Posted May 9, 2012 Oh yes, I understood that he feels unable to use OpenType, but wanted to point out exactly why OpenType is the proper solution. Link to comment
Member Té… Posted May 10, 2012 Share Posted May 10, 2012 @Ryan – There is. It's on the other side of the space bar: AltGr (Alternate Graphics) Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now