Jump to content
Check out our exclusive articles, videos and font downloads on Patreon!

Court rules on legibility: Times New Roman instead of Garamond

Recommended Posts

Although Garamond is a highly readable font, the statement that Garamond "appears smaller" than either Times New Roman or Century has a basis in fact: its x-height is smaller. However, using a size of Garamond larger than 14 point would be sufficient to compensate for that.

  • Like 1
Link to comment

I believe it refers to the Garamond that is included with Microsoft Office, the particular version of which, unfortunately, not only has a small x-height, but also smaller cap height, making it smaller on the body than the others included with Office.

You could rightly say that changing the point size would fix this, but in Word, this introduces another problem since it would also change the line spacing and therefore how many lines fit on a page. This can also be fixed by changing the line spacing.

Unfortunately, the guidelines seem to want to reduce the recommendation down to point size and font, and nothing more complicated than this. Ergo, Garamond is out.

Screen Shot 2021-03-18 at 7.44.19 AM.png

  • Like 2
Link to comment
  • 5 months later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Check out our typography merch store.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We are placing functional cookies on your device to help make this website better.