Si_Daniels Posted June 1, 2009 Share Posted June 1, 2009 This topic was imported from the Typophile platform In-ter-esting... http://www.macnn.com/blogs/2009/06/01/823.html Link to comment
dyana Posted June 1, 2009 Share Posted June 1, 2009 "Typeface fonts" ? Good thing they cleared that up, I thought I was reading about baptismal fonts. Link to comment
Si_Daniels Posted June 1, 2009 Author Share Posted June 1, 2009 Oh well, looks like a Prima/Vera derived fixed-pitch font included in Snow Leopard... http://blog.jjgod.org/2009/03/17/snow-leopard-font-related-changes/ Move along, nothing to see here... Link to comment
cuttlefish Posted June 2, 2009 Share Posted June 2, 2009 At last, a replacement for the venerable Monaco (though I've been using Andale Mono for that myself anyway). Translating that blog post revealed that Mac OS X 10.6 abandons the .dfont format for .ttc (TrueType Collection) as the favored format of Apple system fonts, though it does not indicate whether legacy compatibility will remain for that or other font formats. Link to comment
kentlew Posted June 2, 2009 Share Posted June 2, 2009 > “Typeface fonts” ? > Good thing they cleared that up Actually, that's just standard language for the Goods & Services field in trademark applications. Link to comment
dyana Posted June 2, 2009 Share Posted June 2, 2009 Boo, way to ruin my snarky, holier-that-thou typenerdery, Kent! ;) Seriously, I thought about that after I posted, but it was late and I decided to go to bed rather than delete. Link to comment
Down10 Posted June 9, 2009 Share Posted June 9, 2009 "Typeface fonts" makes sense; there are fonts for things other than type. Musical notation, for instance. Regarding Menlo, and its base of Bitstream's Vera Sans Mono, I noticed that Apple has tweaked a few glyphs, presumably to display better under Quartz rendering: Link to comment
Si_Daniels Posted June 9, 2009 Author Share Posted June 9, 2009 Nice comparison, but this shows the difference between two Vera derivatives? How do they compare with the original Vera Mono? Or even the original original Prima Mono? Link to comment
Spire Posted June 10, 2009 Share Posted June 10, 2009 Nice comparison, but this shows the difference between two Vera derivatives? How do they compare with the original Vera Mono? Vera Sans Mono is the original monospaced Vera face; there is no Vera Mono. Or even the original original Prima Mono? No Prima Mono either; just Prima Sans Mono. Link to comment
pdokas Posted June 10, 2009 Share Posted June 10, 2009 How about comparing to Panic Inc's Panic Sans, which is a .dfont format font included in their Coda editor? http://panic.com/coda/ Link to comment
Down10 Posted June 11, 2009 Share Posted June 11, 2009 DejaVu's glyphs are mostly unchanged from Vera Sans Mono. The goal of the DejaVu font project is to expand and improve on the character sets of the Vera families in an open-source environment. Panic Sans is based on DejaVu. The changes are fewer than Menlo's—mostly the B, e, hyphen and underscore are the only noticeable differences between Panic Sans and DevaVu/Vera. All the fonts share the same weight width and line-height. Link to comment
Si_Daniels Posted June 15, 2009 Author Share Posted June 15, 2009 Ars-linking... http://arstechnica.com/apple/news/2009/06/font-changes-coming-to-mac-os-... Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now